4 ms·
I think for free will to exist, something neither totally random nor totally deterministic would be required. That’s why free will isn’t really a scientific con
by xevb3k 9y ago
I think for free will to exist, something neither totally random nor totally deterministic would be required. That’s why free will isn’t really a scientific concept.
The idea that there something non-deterministic give some hope that though it “look random” there actually order being directed by “something” there. Essentially if you’re a mind-body dualist, this is the point where mind meets body (would be my understanding).