From the Wikipedia article: Designs for an SZ ligature has been part of typesets from the 1910s until the 1950s, but in the opinion of Herrmann (2011), the lon

From the Wikipedia article: Designs for an SZ ligature has been part of typesets from the 1910s until the 1950s, but in the opinion of Herrmann (2011), the long-standing alphabetic equivalence of ß with ss and the abolition of the optional capitalization of ß as SZ (abandoned in 1996⁽¹¹⁾) means that this is no longer a valid option that "Germans would want to use on a regular basis". ¹¹ until 1996, it was recommended to render ß as SS in allcaps except when there was ambiguity, in which case it should be rendered as SZ. The common example for such a case was IN MASZEN (in Maßen "in moderate amounts") vs. IN MASSEN (in Massen "in massive amounts"), where the difference between the spelling in ß vs. ss could actually reverse the conveyed meaning. Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F contains a concrete example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ABSCHUSZGERAET.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ABSCHUSZGERAET.jpg