2 ms·
i understand what summary is for. what i don't "understand" is why he chose as the target a book that's 24 years old in a fast moving field. actually i do und
by spot 16y ago
i understand what summary is for. what i don't "understand" is why he chose as the target a book that's 24 years old in a fast moving field. actually i do understand: it was a strawman!
i agree with your assessment.
- slocklin 16y agoThis is a non-moving "field." It is nothing but a marketing word for third rate research on things which used to be called "tribology" and "chemistry."