4 ms·
The drive for novelty and exploration is deeply rooted in the human psyche. So it really isn't that surprising at all. As a plus, tons of beneficial technology
by dwaltrip 9y ago
The drive for novelty and exploration is deeply rooted in the human psyche. So it really isn't that surprising at all.
As a plus, tons of beneficial technology and research directly resulted from previous efforts in space. It seems highly likely this would also be the case for efforts to get to Mars or any other space exploration programs.
I think the strongest case against Mars is simply that we should do it, but not now, and instead in several decades. However, my guess is that we have capability to do it now, in an effective manner and for a reasonable cost.
Someone has to pave the way for humanity to spread out into solar system. It will certainly happen in the coming centuries, one way or another. The incredibly rich energy sources available are by themselves such a compelling reason that I think it is inevitable.
Of course, assuming some sort of terrible catastrophe of our own making doesn't set us back a few thousand years...
- earenndil 9y ago> Someone has to pave the way for humanity to spread out into solar system This is less interesting, I think, than spreading out into the galaxy, and the rest of the universe. Now, is this realistic? Absolutely, it's just important to remember that it's not happenning soon or over a short period of time. It'll probably take millions of years. But, ultimately, mars is just a jumping-off point, and past that it's much more interesting to attempt to get to and terraform other planets on other stars.
- rapnie 9y ago> I think the strongest case against Mars is simply that we should do it, but not now, and instead in several decades. yes, this is my feeling on this as well
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]