3 ms·
Yes, I think this remained the case up through Windows ME. It's interesting they didn't use a pared-down 95. Maybe they were worried about Protected Mode causin
by TazeTSchnitzel 9y ago
Yes, I think this remained the case up through Windows ME. It's interesting they didn't use a pared-down 95. Maybe they were worried about Protected Mode causing trouble?
- dfox 9y agoWindows 3.1 always runs in some kind of protected mode, either in 16-bit PM on 286 or as a process inside 32b hypervisor-ish layer on 386 and up.