> Not saying that that means you're wrong. Your statement presumes that the typical conception of "free will" does indeed exist and that this is a universally

> Not saying that that means you're wrong. Your statement presumes that the typical conception of "free will" does indeed exist and that this is a universally held position. As a counterpoint, determinism has many backers. A typical (grossly simplified) physicalist response to your claim is that the illusion of "choice" is really the result of complex processes playing out.