My impression was that humans are still routinely bested by indexes in the long run, so being "dominated" by humans sounds downright scathing. > Those programs

My impression was that humans are still routinely bested by indexes in the long run, so being "dominated" by humans sounds downright scathing. > Those programs may be useful, but they are not A.I. because they are static; they do the same thing over and over until someone changes them. Oh, I see. It's better because it's AI. My mistake, then.