3 ms·
His reply was snarky and created a false dichotomy. The 90% usecase exists in between “lightweight VM’s” and google scale horizontal app deployment. Consider th
by lox 9y ago
His reply was snarky and created a false dichotomy. The 90% usecase exists in between “lightweight VM’s” and google scale horizontal app deployment. Consider that the former is just as much an outlier as the latter. This post is about a pragmatic minimal Ubuntu base image, which would meet neither case well.
- unethical_ban 9y agoIt was snarky. But there is a dichotomy: It's either stateless or stateful. Either I'm supposed to SSH to it or I'm supposed to destroy and redeploy.
- lox 9y agoAgain, consider that you are creating this dichotomy, not the tools, or vast majority of practitioners in this space. Docker comes with (and encourages) lots of ways to persist state, as do orchestration environments like Kubernetes and ECS and you should choose the approach that suits the problem you are solving. If you want containers as lightweight VM's, there are a ton of ways to do that and they are actively supported. I'm reluctant to get off-topic here, because the narrative relating to the actual post should be "Does it makes sense to have openssh in a minimal ubuntu base image", to which the answer is "No, obviously".