31 ms·

Same as it's up to people if they wanna use vaccine or not? The thing is: 1. Those people then are saying how bad and full of viruses Windows it's, even if it'

Same as it's up to people if they wanna use vaccine or not? The thing is: 1. Those people then are saying how bad and full of viruses Windows it's, even if it's only their fault. It's good for technically not-inclined users. And MS is only loosing here, as well as those users. 2. This is how you get botnets, which then take your worldwide DNS down. But yeah, it's only up to these people. Why would I care about botnets DDoS'ing half the net? And why would I care that companies are handling my sensitive personal data on insecure computers? Yeah, no worries. It should only be up to them...

Silhouette 9y ago
Those people then are saying how bad and full of viruses Windows it's, even if it's only their fault. It's good for technically not-inclined users. That's a good argument for making security updates on-by-default. It's not a good argument for making all updates on-whether-you-like-it-or-not. This is how you get botnets, which then take your worldwide DNS down. The solution to botnets is to cut offending devices off the Internet at the ISP level. You can't trust local security measures in this context anyway. And why would I care that companies are handling my sensitive personal data on insecure computers? You're complaining about the security of sensitive personal data, in a discussion about an OS that can literally deploy arbitrary updates and upload arbitrary information to a third party for use in unknown ways? Your concerns about your privacy are fair, but I think you're on the wrong side of the debate here.