> I have heard "attractive nuisance" used (not in a legal context) Well, you linked to the legal context, so you'll have to excuse me for misunderstanding. >

> I have heard "attractive nuisance" used (not in a legal context) Well, you linked to the legal context, so you'll have to excuse me for misunderstanding. > "well, what else did you think was going to happen?" People not stealing bikes, vandalising them and throwing them in nature? Do we really have to invent pseudo-legalities to get around the simple fact that people doing this are utter assholes (and criminals), regardless of whether the company providing these bikes have behaved perfectly?