3 ms·
If there were a lower bound, then there would be no point in insuring against it. If I knew I will incur at least $1B a year in legal losses, then I'd budget fo
by gnode 9y ago
If there were a lower bound, then there would be no point in insuring against it. If I knew I will incur at least $1B a year in legal losses, then I'd budget for it. Insurance is for covering the upper bound.