It seems to me that the author’s main criticism isn’t that the people practicing cognitive science are unaware of the limitations, but that they pretend the lim

It seems to me that the author’s main criticism isn’t that the people practicing cognitive science are unaware of the limitations, but that they pretend the limitations don’t exist when making policy recommendations: > Science genuinely relevant to food had yet to be invented. So domestic scientists applied irrelevant science, and prescribed scientific-seeming rituals to be adhered to when cooking.