> disjointed, hard-to-follow argument, that feels like its backed by no (or irrelevant) facts Respectfully, I have to disagree. I watched this documentary for

> disjointed, hard-to-follow argument, that feels like its backed by no (or irrelevant) facts Respectfully, I have to disagree. I watched this documentary for the first time last night and came away feeling that the jarring tone was deliberate (the whole point was that our unease about the chaos of the world is being exploited for political means). I'm curious if you were familiar with many of the events depicted in the documentary? I suspect it would have been harder to follow without some knowledge of these events.