4 ms·
I was a bit scared about what she'd consider the "top 5" She didn't rate them as "top 5". She got sent 5 unlabeled samples by the OP and was asked to assess
by frossie 16y ago
I was a bit scared about what she'd consider the "top 5"
She didn't rate them as "top 5". She got sent 5 unlabeled samples by the OP and was asked to assess their quality.
- mhd 16y agoWell, I couldn't know that before I clicked. The headline here just said "top 5".
- Deestan 16y agoCan anyone please let me know their reasons for downvoting this comment? Lately I've seen a lot of what appears to be mindless pile-on downvoting of perfectly on-topic, polite, informative comments. It is making me wonder if there's some bot behaviour going on, or if something in the site's comment system is broken.
- Robin_Message 16y agoI didn't vote on the comment, but I can imagine it was downvoted for slightly rude tone "Well, I couldn't know that" and claiming not to read the article but only "the headline".
- Deestan 16y agoThanks for the answer. I must have read it in a different light then; to me it looked like a complaint about a misleading submission headline.
- mhd 16y agoThank you, that was what I actually meant. When I saw the headline here regarding the "top 5", I didn't know if my inner fanboy could handle e.g. having the singer of Slipknot amongst that set. I thought that my initial comment was evidence enough that I did RTFA. And I actually inserted the "Well" to make it sound less harsh, but apparently that made it look a bit arrogant to a few people. The nuances of written language…
- barry-cotter 16y agoThe people who downvoted are expressing disapproval of a failure to closely read the article. He says he was scare d to see who she chose to critique before clicking, but we infer from his discussion that he did in fact click and read. Therefore, the fact that he was ignorant of how the singers to be rated were selected implies skimming. It was a way of saying:RTFA