I suppose the more relevant quote is: > he no longer thought it possible that all conscious experience, particularly one’s perception of beauty, could be a “me

I suppose the more relevant quote is: > he no longer thought it possible that all conscious experience, particularly one’s perception of beauty, could be a “mere electrophysiological epiphenomenon,” https://lesswrong.com/lw/or/joy_in_the_merely_real/ https://lesswrong.com/lw/or/joy_in_the_merely_real/ Though for the music one the “transcend spatial limitations of matter” is the part I take issue with. It’s unclear what it even means, but seems to imply some supernatural specialness.