I agree. I intended to make it clear with my first sentence that Streams as described in the article is just a subset of Reactive Programming. My point is tha

I agree. I intended to make it clear with my first sentence that Streams as described in the article is just a subset of Reactive Programming. My point is that Functional, Reactive, and Streams programming have common concepts that are important programming tools, when used appropriately. However, Reactive Programming is neither exclusively Functional nor Streams-based, although the article implies it.