3 ms·
. . . and still look horrible. You can't say that here! But the screenshot makes it pretty clear. Edit: that's the default engine, as it says in the blog post
by houseabsolute 16y ago
. . . and still look horrible.
You can't say that here! But the screenshot makes it pretty clear.
Edit: that's the default engine, as it says in the blog post. I still think GTK looks awful, but this is not really good evidence.
- ataranto 16y agoGTK+ doesn't "look" like anything. Themes and engines do though. Is that your complaint?
- houseabsolute 16y agoTechnicalities and semantics. The only thing that matters is what I'm presented with as a user, and what I get when I use it does not look good.
- naner 16y agoYeah the default look is crap. We don't have a lot of options on Linux, though. Qt doesn't have many good themes either and it doesn't feel as nice as GTK. Enlightenment feels really quirky and unpolished.