Yes and no. Renderman is a very different architecture to the "SGI-like architecture" (the terminology the author uses) that cards at the time were settling in

Yes and no. Renderman is a very different architecture to the "SGI-like architecture" (the terminology the author uses) that cards at the time were settling into (and desktop GPUs still use). In Renderman, you subdivide all triangles until the triangles are all smaller than a single pixel, then you collect all triangles that effect each pixel, sort them, decide which triangles will effect the final color and then run the pixel shader for those triangles. Since the subdivided triangles are smaller than a single pixel, you only need to run the pixel shader once, and you don't have to worry about perspective correct texturing. It would be near impossible to implement this at real time in hardware. Modern Graphics APIs took one small aspect of Renderman (pixel shaders) and re-implemented them on top of the existing "SGI-like architecture". They also invented the idea of vertex shaders to program the hardware Transform and Lighting units. (Renderman used distortion/displacement shaders instead. Vertex shaders could only move vertexes. distortion/displacement shaders could distort any point on the triangle in arbitrary ways). Sidenote: Shaders are more of a programming interface than a hardware feature. GPUs with powerful programmable per-pixel pipelines appeared before pixel shaders, and graphics programmers had to configure them with DirectX 7 and OpenGL 1.3's TextureEnviroment features. Shaders just gave programmers a much more sane way to access those same features