4 ms·
I'm getting server error 502. But I'm looking forward to testing this. I can certainly see this as being useful. In my research area some discussion is takin
by tmalsburg2 9y ago
I'm getting server error 502. But I'm looking forward to testing this. I can certainly see this as being useful. In my research area some discussion is taking place on twitter but it's too scattered and too superficial to be useful.
- danielecook 9y agoWorking on this should be back in a little bit!
- danielecook 9y agoIf there are any subs you would like to have added please let me know. Currently, I know the site is restricted to biology and a small stats section but I can easily add chemistry, physics, math, etc.
- phireal 9y agoOcean sciences would be good (oceanography, marine biology, remote sensing), but I'm not sure to what level of detail you're willing to split subjects.
- tmalsburg2 9y agoI'd be interested in having subs for "cognitive science" and "linguistics". Perhaps allow users to create new subs? If this is taking off, you will never be able to keep up with requests for new subs. Like reddit, your platform should rely on self-organization to the extent possible.
- ivh 9y agoYes, please, physics and astronomy. Maybe the same subdivisions as arXiv? Promising site!
- kiliantics 9y agoSeconded. I'd like to see if the astro-ph sections get any traction here.
- danielecook 9y agoThanks - I'd love to add these but I was unsure whether they would be appropriate. Going off of the biology section on arXiv - I think there are better ways to subdivide a field. Are there any improvements/consolidation that would be appropriate for those subdivisions on arXiv for physics and astronomy?