4 ms·
Have used Bulma a bit and definitely easy to get up and running with something practical and aesthetically pleasing. However for a recent site build [0] we wen
by justkez 9y ago
Have used Bulma a bit and definitely easy to get up and running with something practical and aesthetically pleasing.
However for a recent site build [0] we went with Tachyons [1] - for anyone who's not come across it; give it a try!
The immutability of the styles make it so quick to iterate and develop. Despite the start-up cost of learning something new (with a slightly different approach), I'd say it's significantly quicker to get something done with.
[0] https://www.bestcoffee.guide https://www.bestcoffee.guide
[1] http://tachyons.io http://tachyons.io
- reacharavindh 9y ago+1 for Tachyons. I'm not a web developer and I used Tachyons for a personal website and a front end for a tool. It felt very comfortable to work with, and the examples section they have was incredibly useful as a mix & match copy/paste source. Loved the results.
- tiuPapa 9y agoOne doubt about tachyons. Can I use it with CSS grid?
- mhd 9y agoI'm torn a bit between Tachyons and Tailwind[1]. The latter shares some of Tachyons ideas, but a bit less terse and with more tooling support. [1]:https://tailwindcss.com/ https://tailwindcss.com/
- 1_player 9y agoI've played with both, and my vote definitely goes to Tailwind. Tachyons popularised the concept of functional CSS, but it's very hard to customize (a lot of copy/paste, custom cli tool to recompile), whereas Tailwind has a per-project configuration file for colors, breakpoints, etc. and you can build components out of their CSS primitives (if you use PostCSS).
- mrtksn 9y agoWow Tachyons looks really nice, I like the colours a lot.