4 ms·
Says every product person I've ever worked with who didn't want to actually be data driven.
by grogenaut 9y ago
Says every product person I've ever worked with who didn't want to actually be data driven.
- brain5ide 9y agoThere are two kinds of product people: those who can't design and those who don't understand statistics.
- ewjordan 9y agoI understand the fear, though - when you're data driven, you can actually numerically measure the contribution of every feature that's tested, and in a lot of cases figure out the exact impact on revenue. In a culture where everything is tested, it's a very small step from there to stack ranking your product designers based mostly on how the features they designed did. I'm not necessarily against that as a valid way to measure job performance if it's done intelligently (for one, realizing that there's a lot of blind luck and variance, and it takes time to smooth out) - I mean, if you're in sales and you're not booking any sales, you don't get to hide from that. But it's also really easy to get ranking and evaluation schemes wrong, so I understand why people would be nervous about it and prefer soft-skill-based evaluations instead.
- grogenaut 9y agovalid point. However I also often see "politics optimized sales" where the current pet project of whoever has the most swing goes up front even if it's a terrible product and death to revenue.