12 ms·
That's exactly what I thought, but then the recent FCC report (quoted at https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/hawaii-ema-fires-missile-alert-sender-confu
by garblegarble 9y ago
That's exactly what I thought, but then the recent FCC report (quoted at https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/hawaii-ema-fires-missile-alert-sender-confusion-over-test-wasnt-new/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/hawaii-ema-fires... with the source scanned and available at https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/report2018-01-29-181149.pdf https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/repor...) says:
>Employee 1 has been a source of concern for the same SWP staff for over 10 years. Employee 1’s poor performance has been counseled and documented and the SWP members have stated that they are “not comfortable with Employee 1 as a supervisor, two-man team, or as a part of the SWP in general. He does not take initiative and has to be directed before he takes action. He is unable to comprehend the situation at hand and has confused real life events and drills on at least two separate occasions.”
- candiodari 9y agoWas that sentence written before or after the event ? Answer: after. So I give it at least 50% that this is scapegoating.