4 ms·
The key part of GPs suggestion again... "great performance at a fraction of the cost of Intel" Only two points need to be true for that statement to hold up:
by ZenoArrow 9y ago
The key part of GPs suggestion again...
"great performance at a fraction of the cost of Intel"
Only two points need to be true for that statement to hold up:
* Performance levels that GP is happy with.
* Cheaper than Intel.
Which point(s) do you disagree with?
- nottorp 9y agoWere there laptops with Athlon64s back then? Maybe the huge ones with desktop parts. However, at that time, on the desktop, AMD was 80-90% of the performance for 50-60% of the price. Fine with me, I was using one.