> Worse, they divert funds that could be put to better use underwriting public services such as schools, housing programs, job training, and transportation, whi

> Worse, they divert funds that could be put to better use underwriting public services such as schools, housing programs, job training, and transportation, which are more effective ways to spur economic development. This group of economists just claimed the government can grow better than Amazon. This isn't some random company or a football stadium that produces very little; this is one of the best performing, highest growth companies ever created. I'd give the kitchen sink away to get a FAANG company in my district if I were in charge. This is a group of almost entirely liberal economist who've never seen a tax they didn't like. Claiming the government can grow better than Amazon, and I wonder where is the proof of this?