> This is money that could have been better spent to fund something more useful It sounds like your argument is that their projects are very useful, but underf

> This is money that could have been better spent to fund something more useful It sounds like your argument is that their projects are very useful, but underfunded, so the FSF must be denied funding. The logic is difficult to follow. Is it that you’d like to be able to fund individual parts of the GNU project that are important to you?