3 ms·
> By 1982 the craze was over and the toy's Hungarian manufacturer was going bust — quite a feat when you consider that probably more than 100 million Cubes were
by zeveb 9y ago
> By 1982 the craze was over and the toy's Hungarian manufacturer was going
bust — quite a feat when you consider that probably more than 100 million Cubes
were sold worldwide. But that was precisely the problem: a centrally planned
economy isn’t accustomed to dealing with consumer crazes. A Budapest writer,
Mezei Andras, has written a book and a play called The Hungarian Cube
chronicling the debacle. It started when the officials at the small
manufacturing cooperative, Politech nika, insisted on trying to expand their
operations to meet the burgeoning demand instead of farming out work to other
factories.
> “The company took a loan from the government,” Andras told me, “but they had
to wait nine or ten months for it to be approved by all the proper committees. Then it took them six months to order and receive the manufacturing
equipment they needed. By that time the craze was finished, so the company
had a large debt and no popular product, and the state had to save it from
going bankrupt.”
There's a lesson in that episode, which applies both to government and large corporations — it's a good part of why startups have such an economic advantage: they can pivot at the drop of a hat, relatively speaking.
- dcow 9y agoI think it applies to startups too.