4 ms·
The MPL is very widely used. By what or whose standards is it a "non-standard license"? It's listed in the OpenSource.org list of approved OS licenses: https:/
by vintagedave 9y ago
The MPL is very widely used. By what or whose standards is it a "non-standard license"?
It's listed in the OpenSource.org list of approved OS licenses: https://opensource.org/licenses https://opensource.org/licenses
Your link is about writing your own open source license, not about which licenses are standard. Nowhere in that blog is any mention of Mozilla. I am not sure what you are trying to say by linking to it.
- MaxBarraclough 9y agoYou got me - it's more recognised than I thought. Wikipedia tells me it's a copyleft licence, but one that's 'weaker' than the GPL.