3 ms·
This is one of the areas where I wished there were some collusion and journalists and scientists always published stories that recommend more movement than is a
by yoz-y 9y ago
This is one of the areas where I wished there were some collusion and journalists and scientists always published stories that recommend more movement than is actually necessary.
I get the point of the article, but to me it seems that every time there is some new research on "how to achieve okay results with less movement and/or time" people will move less.
Not that I do that much of physical activity myself, but I am not complacent about it.
- prepend 9y agoEvidence is important. The goal is to have improved health, not 10k steps. If you want more adherence to interventions you want to constantly review better evidence. Collusion would require that the answer be known already.
- yoz-y 9y agoWell we do know part of the answer. The 3x Active 10 is better than 10k. I do not have a problem with the results, but with the fact that search for "how little can one move and still remain somewhat healthy" is a thing.
- Sean1708 9y ago> every time there is some new research on "how to achieve okay results with less movement and/or time" people will move less Moving more doesn't necessarily mean you'll be healthier, the entire point of the article is that a shorter time spent doing vigorous exercise is better for you than a longer time spent doing relaxed exercise.