> It's a socialist program. > It's effective. I never said there shouldn't be any social services. I don't think 100% socialism is the answer, though. > It's

> It's a socialist program. > It's effective. I never said there shouldn't be any social services. I don't think 100% socialism is the answer, though. > It's cheaper. You are comparing San Francisco to other areas which run these programs, and holding it up as if it is the only alternative to socialism. This is hardly true, isn't it? > It's giving housing first. Only to those that play by the rules. I think that is really the best solution out there. A compromise between self responsibility and care. > Finally, Numbers and Chicago don't care what you think. And? You thought I think they do?