3 ms·
Yeah, this is point on... no. Unless a price of a home is ridiculously cheap (under $100 a month?), and even then, people without any income and/or mentally un
by baseethrowaway 9y ago
Yeah, this is point on... no.
Unless a price of a home is ridiculously cheap (under $100 a month?), and even then, people without any income and/or mentally unwell people will not magically become non-homeless. Next time, read your post two times after writing and check for logical errors.
- sorenbs 9y agoIn Berlin you can live in a decent apartment in the city center for 400 $ per month. The only reason this is not possible in SF is that you have so much low density crap even in walking distance of the center. This is insane.
- remarkEon 9y agoHow in the world is that point incorrect? Housing isn’t being built at nearly the required rates to at least depress the growth in costs - and that’s been fairly well established here and elsewhere. Are you saying that population growth in California isn’t a factor here? AFAIK the growth rate is still positive, albeit decreasing. Though that’s statewide, the pattern is the same in SF. This sounds like a basic supply and demand question, no?