3 ms·
That is absolutely an emoji. The term predates their inclusion in Unicode.
by nothrabannosir 9y ago
That is absolutely an emoji. The term predates their inclusion in Unicode.
- anonfunction 9y agoI believe these text based characters are called emoticons whereas an emoji is an image.
- nothrabannosir 9y agoWell, then I was absolutely wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- bitexploder 9y ago¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- ozzmotik 9y ago¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- madeofpalk 9y agoIt's absolutely not an emoji. At best, it's an emoticon. > Originally meaning pictograph, the word emoji comes from Japanese e (絵, "picture") + moji (文字, "character"). The resemblance to the English words emotion and emoticon is purely coincidental. Emoji specifically refers to these 'pictures' that were definitely transmitted via Unicode, originating in the 90s from Japan. > For NTT DoCoMo's i-mode, each emoji is drawn on a 12×12 pixel grid. When transmitted, emoji symbols are specified as a two-byte sequence, in the private-use range E63E through E757 in the Unicode character space, or F89F through F9FC for Shift JIS. As you pointed out, this predates the Unicode standard that we have now, but there is still a very distinct difference between emoticons (which this is) and emojis (which this definitely isn't)
- guessmyname 9y agoEmoji — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji Emoticon — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon
- madeofpalk 9y ago> Users from Japan popularized a kind of emoticon called kaomoji (顔文字; lit. 顔(kao)=face, 文字(moji)=character(s)) that can be understood without tilting one's head to the left. Interesting. So more accurately, this is a kaomoji.