4 ms·
Interesting, I read it with the second meaning and not the first. I'm italian and in my language sentences are less structured, allowing you to move parts arou
by DeusExMachina 16y ago
Interesting, I read it with the second meaning and not the first.
I'm italian and in my language sentences are less structured, allowing you to move parts around "almost freely". So for me it's natural to bond "complements" to the nearest "object" in the sentence (sorry, I don't know the right words for this).
Is it different in English?
- StavrosK 16y agoIt's ambiguous, so the behaviour is undefined. The author should change the sentence to make it conform to the standards.