5 ms·
> And i moved away from Windows to get away from that crap. This is the dilemma of The Linux Desktop (pick Ubuntu, GNOME, systemd, or all of them). Things like
by sedachv 9y ago
> And i moved away from Windows to get away from that crap.
This is the dilemma of The Linux Desktop (pick Ubuntu, GNOME, systemd, or all of them). Things like internationalization, plug and play, network configuration, are all important to provide. Trying to provide them to the demographic of people that use Microsoft Windows ends up with solutions that resemble those of Microsoft Windows. Meanwhile power users and developers get alienated and end up implementing those things in a far more efficient and efficient to use way. Running Emacs as my X11 window manager gives me far better internationalization capabilities than GNOME. xmodmap is a better way to configure the keyboard than the GUI tools in GNOME and LXDE (no more worries about losing configuration on updates, for one). Linux web browser video playback and font antialiasing has been such a great feature that I now do half of my browsing with w3m (through emacs-w3m) with the X11 misc-fixed fonts. It is faster to connect to wireless networks using OpenBSD's ifconfig than it is to use nm-applet. The list just goes on - who even needs desktop notifications? Do all projects that try to be "user friendly," like GNOME and Ubuntu and systemd, end up being power user unfriendly?
- Diederich 9y ago> Do all projects that try to be "user friendly," ... end up being power user unfriendly? Interesting question. Can you think of any examples of projects that started (roughly speaking) simple, power-user friendly but not end-user friendly that grew to become complex, power AND end-user friendly?