4 ms·
One article (or "research") rarely proves anything. This article in particular has been contested.
by paradoja 16y ago
One article (or "research") rarely proves anything. This article in particular has been contested.
- bitboxer 16y agoI am aware of that. Can somebody please pinpoint the errors or show articles that explain where the writer has done errors? I am curious if it will be worth to switch, but I need some facts first :) .
- tome 16y agoAs a very happy Dvorak-user I'd say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". I switched because there was a compelling reason (repetitive strain injury). If you don't have a compelling reason, it's highly unlikely to be worth your time.
- michael_dorfman 16y agoHave you read the article in question? It does a pretty thorough job of analyzing (and demolishing) the "research" presented, by Dvorak, in favor of the Dvorak keyboard. If anybody has a strong, data-based counter-argument in favor of Dvorak, I'd like to hear it.
- ZeroGravitas 16y agoThere's a rebuttal here. I don't know if you'd consider it a "strong, data-based counter-argument", but then I don't think the Fables paper does a "pretty thorough job of analyzing (and demolishing) the "research" presented" either, rather it reads like the politically motivated hit piece that it almost certainly is. http://dvorak.mwbrooks.com/dissent.html http://dvorak.mwbrooks.com/dissent.html