3 ms·
> As free LKRG becomes somewhat popular and maybe a target of some exploits, we might introduce paid LKRG Pro as a means to fund the project and provide further
by badrabbit 9y ago
> As free LKRG becomes somewhat popular and maybe a target of some
exploits, we might introduce paid LKRG Pro as a means to fund the
project and provide further diversity (with Pro's smaller userbase being
beneficial), extra and specialized functionality (e.g., detection of
container escapes), and maybe distro-specific binary builds.
Hmm,this is what went wrong with grsec. Love the idea though. Why not charge for commercial support and keep all features free?
Tangentially, this feels a lot like Microsoft's KPP https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_Patch_Protection https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_Patch_Protection