3 ms·
And any direct war that happened after 1945, had one belligerent that did not possess nuclear weapons, who turned out to be loser. That's the reason victor deci
by godelmachine 9y ago
And any direct war that happened after 1945, had one belligerent that did not possess nuclear weapons, who turned out to be loser. That's the reason victor decided to wage war against him, citing some puny reason for the aggression.
- ternaryoperator 9y ago> And any direct war that happened after 1945, had one belligerent that did not possess nuclear weapons, who turned out to be loser The Vietnam War would seem to belie your claim
- godelmachine 9y agoI don't think Vietnam had nuclear weapons back then, or did they?
- ternaryoperator 9y agoThe US did
- abusoufiyan 9y agoDo you really think the Americans "won" Iraq or Afghanistan? 15+ years of war, many trillions of dollars spent, nearly a million civilian casualties in Iraq, and what is there to show for it?