8 ms·

I mean, I kind of agree with you, but honestly, would you really want to be the crazy guy yelling in a lobby? Or the employee getting yelled at for something yo

I mean, I kind of agree with you, but honestly, would you really want to be the crazy guy yelling in a lobby? Or the employee getting yelled at for something you didn't do? I'm not a confrontational or angry person and would far prefer someone who reads this and works for Coinbase to just reach out to me and make it right. Then again, if another month goes by with no action, I really might end up being the guy marching around with a sign in lobby, who knows...

ridgeguy 9y ago
Take a lawyer with you. Mutter "intentional infliction of emotional distress" and a few other phrases s/he may give you. To me, it sounds like you're treating Coinbase as a friend who's hit a tough patch, rather than as a business. Requiring them to perform as a business does not make you "the crazy guy yelling in a lobby". It makes you a customer.
- aphextron 9y ago
  >Requiring them to perform as a business does not make you "the crazy guy yelling in a lobby". It makes you a customer. Precisely. The inculcation of the former attitude among the masses has been a huge victory for this wave of monopolistic industries. Companies like Google have effectively trained humans to act like software bugs.
  - benbreen 9y ago
    Huh, food for thought. I may end up writing a blog post about this whole ordeal, and I think that's an interesting takeaway from it. "Training humans to act like software bugs" in particular is an interesting turn of phrase. Thanks. Anyway, to be honest -- and this reflects not so much my unfamiliarity with the law but my quasi-familiarity with it, having worked as a legal assistant -- I was actually afraid of bringing lawyers into the mix. At some level, I feared that this newly monopolistic, venture-backed company would be more than willing to see me in court and would somehow manage to win, leaving me with crazy lawyer fees. It's sad that this was my train of thought, but in retrospect, it's why I took such a weirdly friendly, almost abject tone with them throughout the whole process. I have known and worked for enough lawyers to know that once you open that Pandora's box with a well-funded adversary, things can get unpredictable.

ridgeguy 9y ago

Take a lawyer with you. Mutter "intentional infliction of emotional distress" and a few other phrases s/he may give you. To me, it sounds like you're treating Coinbase as a friend who's hit a tough patch, rather than as a business. Requiring them to perform as a business does not make you "the crazy guy yelling in a lobby". It makes you a customer.

aphextron 9y ago
>Requiring them to perform as a business does not make you "the crazy guy yelling in a lobby". It makes you a customer. Precisely. The inculcation of the former attitude among the masses has been a huge victory for this wave of monopolistic industries. Companies like Google have effectively trained humans to act like software bugs.
- benbreen 9y ago
  Huh, food for thought. I may end up writing a blog post about this whole ordeal, and I think that's an interesting takeaway from it. "Training humans to act like software bugs" in particular is an interesting turn of phrase. Thanks. Anyway, to be honest -- and this reflects not so much my unfamiliarity with the law but my quasi-familiarity with it, having worked as a legal assistant -- I was actually afraid of bringing lawyers into the mix. At some level, I feared that this newly monopolistic, venture-backed company would be more than willing to see me in court and would somehow manage to win, leaving me with crazy lawyer fees. It's sad that this was my train of thought, but in retrospect, it's why I took such a weirdly friendly, almost abject tone with them throughout the whole process. I have known and worked for enough lawyers to know that once you open that Pandora's box with a well-funded adversary, things can get unpredictable.