I say unlimited because concurrent reads were basically a non-issue for Snowflake. You could have as many users reading from the same table as you wanted. Mean

I say unlimited because concurrent reads were basically a non-issue for Snowflake. You could have as many users reading from the same table as you wanted. Meanwhile "Redshift enforces a query concurrency limit of 15 on a cluster." http://blog.blazeclan.com/what-is-amazon-redshift-11-key-points-remember/ http://blog.blazeclan.com/what-is-amazon-redshift-11-key-poi...