4 ms·
Nice attacks. It would make more sense if you had more than pure bunkum to back them up.. Quantum entanglement is happening constantly everywhere. For instance
by goldenkey 9y ago
Nice attacks. It would make more sense if you had more than pure bunkum to back them up..
Quantum entanglement is happening constantly everywhere. For instance, electrons in atoms are entangled. A single particle can be entangled with the vacuum. Entanglement is always relative..everything could be entangled but we don't have sight of the other party. A notable thought by Gerard Hoof't and other prominent physicists-- is that time forms fundamentally from entanglement of space.
Links below in order to provide facts to Dr. Attacqq: (queue sciency words to intimidate..Boo!)
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Are_there_natural_entangled_particles https://www.researchgate.net/post/Are_there_natural_entangle...
- Chris2048 9y ago> Quantum entanglement is happening constantly everywhere This doesn't mean it isn't a limited phenomenon
- goldenkey 9y agoWhen you come up with the right probability measure for comparing infinities that lack cardinalities, get on that millenium prize.
- Chris2048 9y agoWhat are you talking about? How does this relate to the topic at hand?
- goldenkey 9y agoYour probability has to be out of some set of events. You want to talk about a fraction of space where an infinitesimal phenomena is happening? Zoinks! How about a fraction of time? Zoinks! You don't realize how silly the question you are asking is, when considering infinitesimals and infinities.
- Chris2048 9y agoI still don't know what you're talking about. The phenomenon is limited in the sense it doesn't support some of the claims being made. If you can't "talk about a fraction of space where an infinitesimal phenomena is happening" this also would supports that these claims are not credible..