4 ms·
as someone who has had a proper merchant account in the past, my impression is that the customer has a lot more power than the merchant, when it comes to charge
by lsc 9y ago
as someone who has had a proper merchant account in the past, my impression is that the customer has a lot more power than the merchant, when it comes to chargebacks. Chargebacks are super damaging to the owner of the merchant account[1], and while you can fight them, and sometimes win, my impression was that at least as a small operator, the end-user had the benefit of the doubt.
I'd bet money that "we made some ridiculous claim to be able to charge you after the fact for doing something reasonable" wouldn't hold up against the chargeback.
This is the thing; in most countries, America included, 'freedom of contract' is constrained by many laws, including 'reasonableness' tests. Personally, I think this is a feature, not a bug.
[1]chargebacks are one of the things that changes how much 'reserve' the merchant account holds back... if you don't have great credit, and/or if you have chargebacks, sometimes the merchant account will hold your money for months before releasing it to you. You really want to avoid chargebacks, as a merchant.
- tyingq 9y agoConcur. The only chargebacks I've ever won are when the customer admits something incriminating in an email, or claims "item not received" when they signed for it. "Item not as described" is a huge loophole to get whatever you want for free. Hopefully the card issuers track repeated abuse. The banks don't even ask for proof the item was returned. Amex is particularly brazen if you want to steal free products.