3 ms·

In other news, Chrome, a Firefox clone, has beaten Firefox to version 4, and also to version 5... ... Or maybe, just maybe, comparing version numbers across di

• sjs 16y ago
  Better not compare releases and new features either ... like it or not TextMate is stagnant.
  • nanairo 16y ago
    If you want to compare features, then please do. I love TextMate but it's a tool, and I'm happy to drop it if something better comes along (which might be TM2 or not, don't care). But discussing/comparing features is a sensible topic. Saying that E-text beat Textmate to version 2 it useless. First, version number has nothing to do with features (as I was pointing out in the browser world). Second you can say E-text 2 is better than the latest Textmate, but nothing more: nobody apart from the author (and his collaborator) knows what's TM2 gonna be like.
• gord 16y ago
  I dislike admitting that Chrome is a lot faster than Firefox in some useful ways. One useful way I ran into is with 2000+ svg objects in a custom UI. SVG + Javascript is a fantastic platform for user interfaces, in my experience... compared to both HTML divs / css /js and also Cocoa native. Please google, turn on svg in Android...
• rimantas 16y ago
  Well, E was inspired heavily by Textmate and IIRC the author of Textmate was involved a bit: http://e-texteditor.com/blog/2006/11 http://e-texteditor.com/blog/2006/11
  • nanairo 16y ago
    Sure. My point wasn't to say that E-text wasn't inspired by Textmate: it even states so clearly on its page. Simply that comparing version numbers is pointless: call it E-text 2010 for all I care, and it won't be better or worse for it.