3 ms·
Static site generators are more than suitable for non-tech users - they used to be called Macromedia Dreamweaver, Microsoft FrontPage; etc. I'd very much like
by pmlnr 9y ago
Static site generators are more than suitable for non-tech users - they used to be called Macromedia Dreamweaver, Microsoft FrontPage; etc.
I'd very much like to see fullon wysiwyg static generators again; it could replace half, if not more, of the WordPress sites around.
- bgrohman 9y agoYeah, you’re right - I forgot about Dreamweaver and similar tools. I do think that adding wysiwyg UIs to a generator puts it in a slightly different class than the type of generator posted here, but your point is a good one. Adding a UI to a simple generator would make it much easier for non-technical people to use.
- sgallant 9y agoStatic site generators are very WYSIWYG friendly, see my comment above about our Jekyll and Hugo CMS. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16254696 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16254696