3 ms·
It actually doesn't destroy that - it assumes that quality will never change and adds a new asset type to digital files. You end up with both collectible/signed
by tomasien 9y ago
It actually doesn't destroy that - it assumes that quality will never change and adds a new asset type to digital files. You end up with both collectible/signed/authentic versions and the infinitely replicable copies. It allows artists to implement scarcity without implementing DRM.
- stctgion 9y agoImplementing scarcity seems like a totally undesirable thing to do, unless your only motive is money
- tomasien 9y agoYes - artists deserve to be able to make money from selling scarcity and authenticity. 100%. If they can do that while not restricting access, it is the best of both worlds.
- thisacctforreal 9y agoThis is a great project, thank you :)