3 ms·
Thanks for the context! Are there intentions to standardize JMAP under IETF?
by Shoothe 9y ago
Thanks for the context!
Are there intentions to standardize JMAP under IETF?
- brongondwana 9y agoI'm literally RIGHT NOW writing up an email to the IETF EXTRA mailing list, following up from the email I sent as co-chair to the IETF JMAP mailing list about conflicts for our session in London at IETF101 in March. We've been working inside the IETF on JMAP since Chicago (IETF98) in March last year.
- Shoothe 9y agoExcellent! Is there a place to look for progress on this front? IETF mailing lists? jmap.io?
- brongondwana 9y agoWe're keeping jmap.io up-to-date with the latest spec (including the calendar and contacts bits - calendar is partially underway through ietf calext - contacts are not yet on standards track) Also: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jmap/about/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jmap/about/ Has links to the latest revisions of the drafts - and to the github repo where issues are being tracked.
- Shoothe 9y agoThanks a lot! I really appreciate it.