4 ms·
To amend, why I'm even bringing this up, what worries me about Drake is this: https://github.com/Factual/drake/pulse/monthly https://github.com/Factual/drake/pu
by fnl 9y ago
To amend, why I'm even bringing this up, what worries me about Drake is this: https://github.com/Factual/drake/pulse/monthly https://github.com/Factual/drake/pulse/monthly
Its GitHub pulse is - dead; For two years now. Makes me think one of the other projects listed might be better choices.
- bringtheaction 9y agoI was about to say maybe it's finished but it has 70 open issues so maybe it was just abandoned? It is at version 1.0.3 though so it could be that it's considered finished. Seems strange to leave the issues open if it was though.
- fnl 9y agoMaybe so. Yet, I can't find any features in Drake that I don't get with Make, too - in fact, it looks to be rather the opposite. Indeed, for some of the tools I listed, they barely have any more functionality than I'd get out of Make & Git alone. And for Make, I'm pretty sure development & support will stick around for a few more years... To me, only Luigi (Hadoop integration), Pachyderm (containers, production deployments in the Enterprise version) and Sacred (Python & TensorFlow integration) really stick out as differentiating themselves. But maybe I'm overlooking something?