4 ms·
No doubt that may be true, but if a company doesn't have a clear market fit, how will more cash solve that? It just extends the opportunity to find such fit. I
by lettergram 9y ago
No doubt that may be true, but if a company doesn't have a clear market fit, how will more cash solve that? It just extends the opportunity to find such fit.
I don't doubt that investment money thrown at the correct product can spur it along. However, I believe most investors are looking for long shots, or returns better than the stock market. To obtain those type of gains, they will invest in the companies that can go boom or bust.
In contrast, the company that doesn't take money is incentivized to simply not go bust (even if it grows more slowly). They have to be cautious, keep their customers and grow. It's a requirement.
That being said, I don't disagree with you. Perhaps, I'm completely wrong in gneral, but from my circle of friends that appears to be the case.
- milesvp 9y agoYou may also be missing the fact that VCs need big exits to be successful. It's very possible that the 2 businesses that are successful just didn't have the percieved potential to be unicorns. I keep hearing rumor that the term 'lifestyle business' has started to take on a pajoritive tone in certain circles, and I suspect it has a lot to do with how little interest the owner has is big growth. I personally would probably never try to get VC funding since my goal in business is always to not work, and big growth requires way more effort than it's worth.