2 ms·
It would be a minor change in wording for a credit reporting agency to say “a person claiming to be x did not pay back a debt” v “person x did not pay back a de
by rileymat2 9y ago
It would be a minor change in wording for a credit reporting agency to say “a person claiming to be x did not pay back a debt” v “person x did not pay back a debt” in the case of identity theft. This would still be useful to the creditor, and ‘true’ to get around your liable idea.
- cornholio 9y agoNot so fast. Aggregating the actions of all these persons claiming to be X in a single number or report is a clear indication they are related and considered pertinent data when a person claiming to be X demands credit - but in fact they are not, and the lack of pertinence is the blame of the agregator. Furthermore, this only affects the real X, since all impersonators can claim to be Y and get around the sloppy data gathering practices of the agencies.