4 ms·

> Owning a home, even while paying a mortgage, offers a lot more freedom, of course while still owing money to someone. Please explain this again. If you buy a

> Owning a home, even while paying a mortgage, offers a lot more freedom, of course while still owing money to someone. Please explain this again. If you buy a home, you have a large illiquid asset, which makes it really difficult to relocate for jobs and downsize living situations if you lose your job all of a sudden. If I lost my job, I'd instantly move into a studio apartment and break the lease I currently have if I wasn't month to month. Contrast that to owning a house, where if you lose your job, you have to sell your house and move, which takes longer than breaking a lease. Also, you'll have to pay brokers' fees and such. Also, you're stuck in your current job market. That might be ok for the Bay Area (and other places), because there are plenty of jobs here. But if you took a job at Anheuser Busch and decide you hate it, you're stuck with a large liability in a market that is not doing great, few other jobs, and a mortgage you still have to pay. Plus housing prices can go down also. You're stuck with a monthly payment for something that's not even worth as much as you paid for it or even owe on it, and you cannot refinance. But sure, you get to paint the walls whatever color you like, as long as it's not visible in the street and the HOA (if you have one) approves.

function_seven 9y ago
Yeah, people have different situations. Sometimes renting is the best choice, sometimes buying is. Each comes with it's pros and cons. One person may value the freedom to do what they want with their home, another might value the other freedom of mobility more. I own, and am in a situation where if I lost my job, I wouldn't have to sell the house. I love not having to ask permission for every change I make. I really love not stressing over the damage my dog does to the floors. The scratches add character as far as I'm concerned. A landlord would probably ding me for thousands to repair it all. Also, the rent can never be raised on me. Nor can I be told I have to leave because the owner is going to sell the property.
- jimmywanger 9y ago
  The point is that owning property constrains freedom rather than enhances it. If you take out debt you owe somebody something. You can't just do what you want.
  - function_seven 9y ago
    It constrains some freedom, delivers others. You gain other freedoms that you don’t have when you’re not the owner. You can build, paint, have messy pets, smoke weed, knock out a wall, be a landlord yourself, and rip out the carpet. You gain some freedoms in exchange for giving up others.
freehunter 9y ago
>Please explain this again. I think you understood it right the first time. you're just deliberately choosing to miss the point. To put it in your snarky-ass tone: Contrast owning a home to renting an apartment. Your landlord could double your rent, or choose to stop leasing. They can put off maintenance while forbidding you from working on it yourself. They can show you an awesome demo unit then give you something else with worse appliances and a terrible paint job and now you're stuck with it. You can have a noisy neighbor move in and the only thing separating you from them is one paper-thin wall. You can pay tons more more for dedicated parking or roll the dice and hope someone doesn't steal the last spot out front. You're completely at the mercy of the housing market: if the market goes up, no matter what you have to pay the new prices when your lease is up, since every place near your work will be raising rates too. And now you're paying double a mortgage for a shitty one-bedroom with a smoker living across the hall drifting the stink into your home. But at sure, you can pay 3x your rent to break your lease and move to another state whenever you want, since normal people totally do that all the time.
- jimmywanger 9y ago
  That's funny, considering you're just setting up strawmen targets and knocking them down. The point was that renting gives you more freedom than buying. > To put it in your snarky-ass tone How was my tone snarky? Also, it's all economics. If the rent is way higher than the mortgage, sure you go ahead and buy. If not, you rent.
- nothingbroken 9y ago
  Why do you compare "owning a home" to "renting an apartment"? Why don't you compare "renting a single family house" to "owning a home?" If you take away the obviously non-comparable "house" versus "apartment" aspect, it's a better comparison. You aren't comparing renting to owning, you are comparing apartments to houses.

function_seven 9y ago

Yeah, people have different situations. Sometimes renting is the best choice, sometimes buying is. Each comes with it's pros and cons. One person may value the freedom to do what they want with their home, another might value the other freedom of mobility more. I own, and am in a situation where if I lost my job, I wouldn't have to sell the house. I love not having to ask permission for every change I make. I really love not stressing over the damage my dog does to the floors. The scratches add character as far as I'm concerned. A landlord would probably ding me for thousands to repair it all. Also, the rent can never be raised on me. Nor can I be told I have to leave because the owner is going to sell the property.

jimmywanger 9y ago
The point is that owning property constrains freedom rather than enhances it. If you take out debt you owe somebody something. You can't just do what you want.
- function_seven 9y ago
  It constrains some freedom, delivers others. You gain other freedoms that you don’t have when you’re not the owner. You can build, paint, have messy pets, smoke weed, knock out a wall, be a landlord yourself, and rip out the carpet. You gain some freedoms in exchange for giving up others.

freehunter 9y ago

>Please explain this again. I think you understood it right the first time. you're just deliberately choosing to miss the point. To put it in your snarky-ass tone: Contrast owning a home to renting an apartment. Your landlord could double your rent, or choose to stop leasing. They can put off maintenance while forbidding you from working on it yourself. They can show you an awesome demo unit then give you something else with worse appliances and a terrible paint job and now you're stuck with it. You can have a noisy neighbor move in and the only thing separating you from them is one paper-thin wall. You can pay tons more more for dedicated parking or roll the dice and hope someone doesn't steal the last spot out front. You're completely at the mercy of the housing market: if the market goes up, no matter what you have to pay the new prices when your lease is up, since every place near your work will be raising rates too. And now you're paying double a mortgage for a shitty one-bedroom with a smoker living across the hall drifting the stink into your home. But at sure, you can pay 3x your rent to break your lease and move to another state whenever you want, since normal people totally do that all the time.

jimmywanger 9y ago
That's funny, considering you're just setting up strawmen targets and knocking them down. The point was that renting gives you more freedom than buying. > To put it in your snarky-ass tone How was my tone snarky? Also, it's all economics. If the rent is way higher than the mortgage, sure you go ahead and buy. If not, you rent.
nothingbroken 9y ago
Why do you compare "owning a home" to "renting an apartment"? Why don't you compare "renting a single family house" to "owning a home?" If you take away the obviously non-comparable "house" versus "apartment" aspect, it's a better comparison. You aren't comparing renting to owning, you are comparing apartments to houses.