> Eventually you'll be firing good people. Not good enough to be in the top 98% though! I think the issue here is that we don't have a good way to even assign

> Eventually you'll be firing good people. Not good enough to be in the top 98% though! I think the issue here is that we don't have a good way to even assign ranks. It's either a social game of politics, or some sterile metric based system that no doubt prefers short-term gains over long-term investment. Thus there's no eventuality about it, you'll be firing all sorts of good people right from the get-go.