96 ms·

Thanks for the feedback; we updated the footer: https://github.com/grpc/grpc.github.io/pull/622/files https://github.com/grpc/grpc.github.io/pull/622/files Not

Thanks for the feedback; we updated the footer: https://github.com/grpc/grpc.github.io/pull/622/files https://github.com/grpc/grpc.github.io/pull/622/files Note that this is an open-source project, and the website itself is on GitHub Pages, so feel free to send us pull requests. Sometimes the reason behind things not changing is not a huge conspiracy, but no one actually having spare time to do it. :)

ocdtrekkie 9y ago
Perfect. It'll be nice when Google isn't the only 'author' ;) but now I can clearly end up finding the CNCF this way. It just seemed apparent from the parent comment that it was possible even Googlers commenting were unaware gRPC was now under the CNCF! :) I generally wouldn't file a PR on someone's copyright line or similar legalese, I don't know what the impact would be for any given organization or how they need to format it.
- mehrdada 9y ago
  CONTRIBUTING.md in the repository[1] explicitly suggests authors to add their name to the AUTHORS file on their first substantial commit should they like to. A reviewer would work with them on the order and formatting. One thing is for sure: there is a diverse contributor base; you can see the full list in the git history. [1] https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md